Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Metricool schedules posts and reports on what happened, with basic competitor tracking folded into the same view, free for 20 posts a month and then from $20 a month billed annually for 5 brands. Rival IQ drops the scheduling entirely and goes deep on one thing: naming rivals and benchmarking your accounts against them on the same axes, with up to 24 months of history, starting at $239 a month for 10 tracked companies and a single user. Rival IQ's own listing sends a solo creator straight to Metricool instead, calling itself agency software at agency prices. The gap is not close: Rival IQ's entry tier costs about twelve times Metricool's.
Metricool | Rival IQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $20 | From $239 |
| Pricing model (they differ) | Free plan, paid tiers | Paid subscription |
| Free tier (they differ) | Yes | No |
| Billing | Monthly or annual | Monthly or annual |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Yes |
Scheduling and analytics across brands
Metricool schedules to most of the networks a creator uses and then reports on what happened, including competitor tracking and paid campaign numbers in the same view. Pricing counts brands rather than seats, which suits somebody running several accounts. The free plan schedules 20 posts a month, enough to decide whether the reports are worth paying for.
Our note
Twenty scheduled posts a month on the free plan lasts a single creator a long time. Against Later the pricing is per brand rather than per social set, which is why it scales better across clients and gives less to somebody managing one account closely.
Only on this side
Benchmark your social against named rivals
Pick Metricool for scheduling plus reporting that covers most creators and small agencies without agency pricing: competitor tracking is included rather than sold separately, and Starter is $20 a month billed annually for 5 brands.
Pick Rival IQ only if the job is specifically benchmarking named competitors in depth for clients who expect that report: up to 40 tracked companies and 24 months of history at the top tier. Drive starts at $239 a month for a single user and 10 companies, and by Rival IQ's own admission, a creator comparing themselves to three rivals can do the same work manually for the price difference.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Yes |
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Their cut | None | Not stated |
|---|
| Runs on (they differ) | Web, iOS, Android | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Social Media Management, Analytics | Analytics, Research & Trends |
|---|
| Works with | YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Twitch, LinkedIn, Pinterest, X, Threads | Instagram, Facebook, LinkedIn, X |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | 1 | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Rival IQ is built around comparison rather than reporting: you name the companies you measure yourself against, and it tracks all of them on the same axes. That framing is why agencies and social teams buy it and why a solo creator usually will not. Historical depth and the number of tracked accounts are what separate the plans. Private analytics for accounts you own are an addition to the public benchmarking, not the point of it.
Our note
The entry tier's single seat is the constraint that catches teams out, because $239 buys one login and the second person costs a jump to $349. This is agency software at agency prices, and a creator comparing themselves to three rivals can do it manually for the difference.
Only on this side