Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Both cover design & graphics. Here is what separates them on price, billing, what you can take with you, and coverage.
Prezi | Whimsical | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $7 | From $10 |
| Pricing model (they differ) | Free trial, then paid | Free plan, paid tiers |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Billing | Not stated | Not stated |
| Free trial | 14 days | Not stated |
| API | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
| Their cut | None | None |
| Runs on (they differ) |
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Presentations that zoom rather than advance
Prezi replaces the slide deck with one canvas the view moves around, which suits an argument with a shape to it more than a list of points. Videos and infographics sit in the same account, so a talk and the clip made from it are not two subscriptions. PowerPoint files import rather than needing rebuilding. The format is the thing to be sure about before paying: an audience expecting ordinary slides can find the movement distracting, and the effect is hard to undo once a deck is built around it.
Our note
Decide on the format before the price, because the zooming canvas is either the entire reason to be here or a distraction your audience will mention afterwards. If you only need slides that look better than the default, Beautiful.ai or Pitch will get you there with less to explain.
Diagrams where viewers cost nothing
Whimsical draws flowcharts, wireframes, mind maps and sticky-note boards in one file type rather than four applications, and it opts for speed over precision: shapes snap, connectors route themselves, and a diagram is finished before a general drawing tool has been configured. Only editors are billed, and viewers are free on every tier including the free one. Guests, team count and file size are what separate the plans. Anybody wanting pixel-exact control over a diagram will find the automatic routing gets in the way.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Web, macOS, Windows, iOS, Android |
| Web, macOS, Windows |
| Covers | Design & Graphics | Design & Graphics, Project Management |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Our note
The free tier is unusually workable, so start there and upgrade when the three-board limit bites rather than on principle. Compare with Miro only if you need an infinite canvas for workshops, because this is faster for structured diagrams and worse for a wall of sticky notes.
Only on this side