Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Hootsuite and Sprout Social are both priced per seat and both built for a team rather than a solo creator. Hootsuite's $99 a month covers ten accounts and is already billed annually; Sprout Social's $99 is the pay-monthly rate for five profiles, dropping to $79 if billed annually instead, half the account cap for a comparable price. The axis is what the team actually does: Sprout leans into inbox triage, review management and reporting for people outside the team, while Hootsuite leans into monitoring across more accounts at each tier.
Scheduling and monitoring for ten accounts up
The heavyweight, priced per seat
Hootsuite | Sprout Social | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $99 | From $99 |
| Pricing model | Free trial, then paid | Free trial, then paid |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Billing | Not stated | Monthly or annual |
| Free trial (they differ) | 14 days | 30 days |
| API | Yes |
Scheduling and monitoring for ten accounts up
Hootsuite schedules posts, answers messages from one inbox and monitors what is being said about a brand and its competitors, which is the combination that keeps it in agencies and marketing teams. The entry plan covers ten social accounts for one person; the tier above lifts that to unlimited and adds inbox automation. Analytics and approval workflows are what the upper plans are actually sold on. It is priced per user per month, so a second person on the account roughly doubles it.
Our note
The per-user pricing is what to model, because a second person roughly doubles the bill and that is where this stops competing with the cheaper schedulers. Choose it when monitoring and approvals are requirements rather than nice to have, and choose almost anything else when they are not.
The heavyweight, priced per seat
Sprout Social is what a social team buys when the job has stopped being scheduling and become inbox triage, approvals, listening and reporting somebody outside the team will read. The consolidated inbox and the review management are the parts creators with a manager tend to notice first. Everything is priced per seat, which is the fact that decides whether it belongs in a one-person setup: a second person doubles the bill.
Choose Hootsuite if the priority is covering more accounts per seat, ten on the entry plan against Sprout's five, with brand and competitor monitoring included from the start. It is the incumbent many staff already know, which is worth something on a team that has used it before.
Choose Sprout Social if the job has become customer service: a consolidated inbox, review management and reports somebody outside the team will read, worth doing the seat math for. At $79 a seat billed annually it undercuts Hootsuite's annual rate, but multiply either one by the number of logins needed, since a solo creator is not the buyer for either tool.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Their cut | None | None |
|---|
| Runs on | Web, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
|---|
| Covers | Analytics, Social Media Management | Social Media Management, Analytics |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Threads |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Our note
Multiply by the number of people who need a login before comparing this with anything else on this list, because that is where the real number appears. If nobody outside your team reads the reports, the reporting is the part you are overpaying for.
Only on this side