Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
getimg.ai puts two dozen image and video models on one credit balance, from $10 a month for 3,000 credits, with commercial rights on every plan. Luma AI layers agents over its own models instead: one request runs several of them and hands back a set of takes to choose from, rather than a single result, from $30 a month for 10,000 credits with commercial use stated on the entry plan. getimg.ai is cheaper and broader in raw model count. Luma's agent layer changes what one request actually returns, several attempts rather than one shot.
getimg.ai | Luma AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $10 | From $30 |
| Pricing model | Paid subscription | Paid subscription |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Billing | Monthly or annual | Monthly or annual |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Yes | Not stated |
| Data export |
Image and video models on one balance
getimg.ai is a front end to a couple of dozen image and video models sharing one credit balance, which is what saves running four subscriptions to compare four models. Editing, upscaling and a speech generator sit in the same account. Commercial rights come with every plan, including the cheapest, which is not true of everything in this category.
Our note
Against a single-model subscription this wins on breadth and loses on depth, because nothing here is tuned the way a dedicated tool is. Pick it when the job is volume and variety, and pick a specialist when one look has to be exactly right.
AI video and image generation with agents
Luma generates video and images, and puts an agent layer over the top so one request can run several models and hand back a set of takes instead of a single clip. Credits meter all of it and the plans differ mainly in how many you get. Commercial use is stated on the entry plan, which is not true of every generator in this category.
Our note
Pick getimg.ai for the cheapest entry into a wide spread of models, $10 a month for 3,000 credits across eleven image and nine video models, with editing, upscaling and speech generation in the same account. It does not run several models per request and hand back a set of takes the way Luma's agents do; each generation here is a single attempt on a chosen model.
Pick Luma AI when several attempts at a shot matter more than raw model count, since its agent layer runs one request across multiple models and returns a set of takes to choose from. Plus is $30 a month for 10,000 credits, three times getimg.ai's entry price, with commercial use and guest edit access included. Compare the credit cost per finished clip against alternatives before committing; the sticker prices alone are not comparable given how differently the two meter.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Not stated |
| Their cut | None | None |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | AI Image Generation, AI Video & Voice | AI Video & Voice, AI Image Generation |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | 1 | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
The agent layer is the actual reason to pick this: getting several takes back in one go maps to how generated video is really used, which is to keep going until one works. Compare the credit cost per clip against Runway before committing, because the sticker prices are not comparable on their own.