Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Both cover research & trends and analytics. Here is what separates them on price, billing, what you can take with you, and coverage.
Awario | Social Blade | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $29 | From $5 |
| Pricing model (they differ) | Free trial, then paid | Free plan, paid tiers |
| Free tier (they differ) | No | Yes |
| Billing | Monthly or annual | Not stated |
| Free trial | Not stated | None |
| API | Not stated | Yes |
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Social listening priced for one person
Awario watches the web and the social networks for a keyword and reports who said it, where, and how much reach they had. Most tools in this corner start in the hundreds a month and sell to agencies. Awario's entry plan is one seat and three topics, which is the shape somebody watching their own name and two competitors actually needs.
Our note
Brand24 is the closest thing to it and starts at $199 a month, which is the whole argument for Awario at the small end. For one person watching one name, the entry plan does what the expensive tools do.
Only on this side
Public stats for channels you do not own
Social Blade has been the place people check somebody else's numbers since long before creator analytics was a product category. Everything public is free to look at, which is why brands, journalists and rival channels all end up here. What a subscription buys is the absence of adverts, longer history and the ranked lists. The estimated earnings figure is a wide range built from public data, and it should be read as one.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Their cut | None | Not stated |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Research & Trends, Analytics | Analytics, Research & Trends |
|---|
| Works with | YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, X, Reddit | YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Twitch |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Our note
The estimated earnings range is the most quoted and least reliable thing on the site, because it is inferred from public view counts and knows nothing about sponsorships, which are usually the larger half. Bronze is enough for occasional checks, and the reason to go past it is the ranked lists rather than the extra history.
Only on this side