Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
PandaDoc builds the proposal itself, rich media and pricing tables in the editor rather than just signing a finished PDF, free for 60 documents a year and then $19 a seat a month once a team needs more. signNow charges by the plan rather than the seat, so a second or fifth collaborator adds nothing to the bill, at $8 a month billed annually against $20 monthly, with no free tier but a straightforward per-account rate. PandaDoc's price multiplies with headcount; signNow's does not. The trade is depth: PandaDoc builds the document, signNow mostly just gets it signed.
Proposals and contracts with e-signature built in
E-signatures with unlimited users on every plan
PandaDoc | signNow | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $19 | From $8 |
| Pricing model (they differ) | Free plan, paid tiers | Free trial, then paid |
| Free tier (they differ) | Yes | No |
| Billing | Monthly or annual | Monthly or annual |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Not stated |
Proposals and contracts with e-signature built in
PandaDoc is a document builder first and a signature tool second, which is the right order for anybody sending sponsorship proposals rather than just countersigning someone else's paper. Templates, a content library and pricing tables live in the editor. The free plan signs documents but will not build the proposals, and that is the half worth paying for.
E-signatures with unlimited users on every plan
signNow sends documents for signature and charges by the plan rather than by the seat, so adding a collaborator does not change the bill. That is the whole reason a small team picks it over the incumbent. Templates, bulk sending and an API that will fire signature requests from your own software are all there; the interface is plainer than the market leader's and costs a quarter as much.
Our note
Against Docusign this is a quarter of the price for the same job, and the unlimited-users line is what makes it cheaper again for a team. The reason to pay Docusign instead is that clients recognise the name on the email.
Pick PandaDoc for sending sponsorship proposals rather than only countersigning somebody else's paperwork: the editor, content library and pricing tables are the actual product, and the free tier's 60 documents a year covers occasional deals before paying anything.
Pick signNow for a team sending contracts regularly where the per-seat charge on other tools adds up: unlimited users on every plan means a second signer costs nothing extra, at $8 a month billed annually. It is plainer than PandaDoc's editor and does not build a proposal from scratch, but at a quarter of what the market leader charges, by its own account, it is priced for volume rather than for polish.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Their cut | None | None |
|---|
| Runs on (they differ) | Web | Web, iOS, Android |
|---|
| Covers | Legal & Contracts | Legal & Contracts |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.