Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Mux is a video API: post a file or a stream to it and get back encoding, storage, delivery and a player in code, billed by the minute, with no dashboard for uploading a marketing video. Its own listing says as much directly: anybody who wants to upload a video and get a link to send should use SproutVideo instead and never see an API key. SproutVideo is that dashboard, with storage and bandwidth included in the plan rather than metered, from $12 a month billed annually for 150GB. Mux's free tier gives 100,000 delivery minutes a month; SproutVideo gives a 30-day trial with no card. These serve different jobs: build video into a product, or host video for people to watch on a site.
Mux | SproutVideo | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $20 | From $12 |
| Pricing model (they differ) | Free plan, paid tiers | Free trial, then paid |
| Free tier (they differ) | Yes | No |
| Billing (they differ) | Usage-based | Monthly or annual |
| Free trial | Not stated | 30 days |
| API |
Video hosting and streaming as an API
Mux is the video layer for somebody building their own product: you post a file or a stream to the API and get back encoding, storage, delivery and a player, billed by the minute. There is no dashboard for uploading a marketing video, and that is the point. Its analytics product measures playback quality for people who already have video working and want to know why it buffers.
Our note
Model your delivery minutes before committing, because delivery rather than storage is what moves the bill on a video anyone watches. api.video and Cloudflare Stream are the direct comparisons, and the choice usually comes down to which player and analytics you want.
Video hosting with the bandwidth included
SproutVideo hosts video for businesses that want a player without YouTube's branding, its recommendations or its comment section. Plans include storage and bandwidth rather than metering them, so the bill is predictable until it is not. Analytics go down to heatmaps of who watched what, which is the reason most people move off a free host in the first place.
Pick Mux if you are an engineer putting video inside a product you are building and need the player and the workflow to be yours. The free plan carries 100,000 delivery minutes a month, and beyond that, usage bills by the minute with a $20 monthly credit included on Launch.
Pick SproutVideo if the job is hosting video on a business or course site with a predictable bill: plans start at $12 a month billed annually for 150GB of storage with bandwidth included, and the 30-day trial needs no card. Against Wistia the same listing notes SproutVideo publishes its overage rates and includes generous bandwidth rather than charging per video, usually the cheaper shape for a large library and a small audience, and the same logic applies against Mux for anybody who does not want to touch an API.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Yes |
| Yes |
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Their cut | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Video Hosting | Video Hosting, Analytics, Media Storage & Review |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Our note
Against Wistia the difference is what happens past the allowance: this publishes its overage rates and includes generous bandwidth, where Wistia charges per video. For a large library watched by a small audience, this is usually the cheaper shape.
Only on this side