Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Both cover analytics. Here is what separates them on price, billing, what you can take with you, and coverage.
Social profile analytics billed per account
Public stats for channels you do not own
Minter.io | Social Blade | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $9 | From $5 |
| Pricing model (they differ) | Paid subscription | Free plan, paid tiers |
| Free tier (they differ) | No | Yes |
| Billing | Monthly or annual | Not stated |
| Free trial (they differ) | 14 days | None |
| API | Not stated |
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Social profile analytics billed per account
Minter.io reports on one social profile at a time and charges that way, which suits somebody running three accounts and nothing like a marketing department. Instagram is where it goes deepest, down to stories, reels, collabs and hashtag performance. Reports are scheduled and emailed rather than waiting in a dashboard nobody opens. Adding a competitor's public profile costs the same as adding your own.
Our note
Count your profiles first and multiply, because this is cheap at two accounts and expensive at ten in a way the headline price hides. Iconosquare and Metricool are the flat-rate comparisons; Minter.io wins when you track few accounts deeply and loses when you track many.
Only on this side
Public stats for channels you do not own
Social Blade has been the place people check somebody else's numbers since long before creator analytics was a product category. Everything public is free to look at, which is why brands, journalists and rival channels all end up here. What a subscription buys is the absence of adverts, longer history and the ranked lists. The estimated earnings figure is a wide range built from public data, and it should be read as one.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Yes |
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Their cut | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Analytics, Social Media Management | Analytics, Research & Trends |
|---|
| Works with | Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, LinkedIn, X, Threads | YouTube, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, Twitch |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Our note
The estimated earnings range is the most quoted and least reliable thing on the site, because it is inferred from public view counts and knows nothing about sponsorships, which are usually the larger half. Bronze is enough for occasional checks, and the reason to go past it is the ranked lists rather than the extra history.
Only on this side