Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Experiment funds science specifically: a researcher posts a hypothesis and a budget, every project is reviewed before it goes public, and funding is all or nothing, at a cost of 8 percent plus roughly 3 to 5 percent processing if it funds. FundRazr runs a personal or cause campaign, memorials, medical costs, community asks, with no monthly cost and, under its Fee Recovery model, an average of 98.5 percent of what is raised reaching the campaign. One is a reviewed platform for a hypothesis. The other is an open page for a person or a cause, and neither accepts what the other is built for.
Experiment | FundRazr | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Billing | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data export |
Crowdfunding for research projects
Experiment funds science: a researcher posts a hypothesis, a budget and a method, and backers pay for the work rather than for a product. Every project is reviewed by a person before it goes public, and funding is all or nothing, so a project that misses its number charges nobody. What backers get back is the result, usually a paper or a data set. Anybody looking for a reward tier will find this a strange place.
Our note
Set the goal at what the work actually needs rather than at an ambitious number, because all-or-nothing turns an over-ambitious target into no money at all. The 8 percent is at the high end for crowdfunding, and what buys it is a reviewed, credible platform that scientific backers already trust.
Crowdfunding that charges the donor, not you
FundRazr runs a campaign page with no monthly cost, and pays for itself either by asking your donors for an optional tip or by asking them to cover the platform fee. Both choices are yours and you can switch mid-campaign. It leans toward memorials, medical costs and community causes rather than product launches.
Pick Experiment if you are a researcher without institutional funding, especially for a small, awkward project a grant committee will not touch. The review step is why scientific backers trust the page. Anybody crowdfunding a product, a film or a personal cause will fail its content review.
Pick FundRazr if you are raising money for a person or a cause and cannot afford to lose a large percentage of it. Under Fee Recovery, most donors agree to cover the platform fee, leaving an average of 98.5 percent of the raise intact. It is not built for a reviewed research pitch, which is what Experiment specifically offers.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Their cut | 8% of what you earn | Not stated |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Crowdfunding | Crowdfunding, Monetization & Payments, Tips & Donations |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Our note
The honest comparison here is Zeffy, which charges nothing at all and covers the card fees too. FundRazr is the better answer if you are not a registered nonprofit, which is what Zeffy asks for at signup.
Only on this side