Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Crowdfundr runs reward and donation campaigns for creators, keeping whatever is raised even if a goal is missed, for a published 5 percent fee. Experiment funds only research: a hypothesis, a method and a budget, reviewed by a person before it goes live, and it charges nothing unless the project hits its all-or-nothing goal, then 8 percent plus processing. One is for a product a backer can hold. The other is for a study whose result is a paper.
Crowdfunding built to leave creators the money
Crowdfunding for research projects
Crowdfundr | Experiment | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Billing | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data export |
Crowdfunding built to leave creators the money
Crowdfundr runs reward and donation campaigns with the platform fee presented as optional to the supporter rather than deducted from the creator, and the company publishes what that works out to in practice. Campaigns are free to start and there is no all-or-nothing rule forcing a goal. The comparison table on its own pricing page names Kickstarter and BackerKit and states their fees beside its own. Discovery is thin, so bring your own audience.
Our note
Compare this against Kickstarter on the assumption that nobody covers your fees, and then treat anything supporters do cover as upside. The absence of an all-or-nothing rule is the bigger practical difference for a creator funding a project that can ship at a smaller scale.
Only on this side
Crowdfunding for research projects
Experiment funds science: a researcher posts a hypothesis, a budget and a method, and backers pay for the work rather than for a product. Every project is reviewed by a person before it goes public, and funding is all or nothing, so a project that misses its number charges nobody. What backers get back is the result, usually a paper or a data set. Anybody looking for a reward tier will find this a strange place.
Pick Crowdfundr if you already have an audience and are funding a product, a creative project or anything with a reward tier attached. There is no all-or-nothing rule, so a campaign that raises less than hoped still keeps the money. The 5 percent fee is the honest number to plan around even though supporters are offered the choice to cover it.
Pick Experiment if you are a researcher without institutional funding and the project is a hypothesis with a method behind it, not a product. Every submission is reviewed before it goes public, which is what makes backers trust a page with no reward tiers. Anybody crowdfunding a film, a gadget or a business will fail that review and should use Crowdfundr instead.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Their cut (they differ) | 5% of what you earn | 8% of what you earn |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Crowdfunding, Monetization & Payments | Crowdfunding |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Our note
Set the goal at what the work actually needs rather than at an ambitious number, because all-or-nothing turns an over-ambitious target into no money at all. The 8 percent is at the high end for crowdfunding, and what buys it is a reviewed, credible platform that scientific backers already trust.