Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
SproutVideo hosts video with storage and bandwidth included in the plan, tracking which seconds got watched without naming who watched them, from $12 a month billed annually. Vidyard hosts video for when a play needs a name attached: who watched, how far they got, useful on a sales page or a pitch to one sponsor, free for a limited number of videos or $24 a seat a month billed annually. Vidyard costs exactly double SproutVideo's entry price for reporting a general audience host does not need at all.
Video hosting with the bandwidth included
Video hosting that reports who watched what
SproutVideo | Vidyard | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $12 | From $24 |
| Pricing model (they differ) | Free trial, then paid | Free plan, paid tiers |
| Free tier (they differ) | No | Yes |
| Billing | Monthly or annual | Not stated |
| Free trial | 30 days | Not stated |
| API |
Video hosting with the bandwidth included
SproutVideo hosts video for businesses that want a player without YouTube's branding, its recommendations or its comment section. Plans include storage and bandwidth rather than metering them, so the bill is predictable until it is not. Analytics go down to heatmaps of who watched what, which is the reason most people move off a free host in the first place.
Our note
Against Wistia the difference is what happens past the allowance: this publishes its overage rates and includes generous bandwidth, where Wistia charges per video. For a large library watched by a small audience, this is usually the cheaper shape.
Only on this side
Video hosting that reports who watched what
Vidyard hosts video for people who need to know what happened after the embed loaded: which viewer watched, how far they got, and what to do about it. That is a sales and marketing shape rather than an audience one, and it is the reason to choose it over a general host. For a creator it earns its place on a course page, a pitch to a sponsor, or anywhere a play is a lead rather than a view. There is a free tier with a video cap.
Pick SproutVideo for video published to an audience: storage and bandwidth are included rather than metered, so the bill is known before the month starts, from $12 a month billed annually. Its heatmaps show which seconds held attention, not which named person watched.
Pick Vidyard when a view is a lead, not an audience member: a course sales page, a sponsor pitch, a follow-up sent to one person. The free tier caps videos per month; paid starts at $24 a seat a month billed annually, exactly double SproutVideo's entry price, and it only earns that price if somebody actually acts on who watched what.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Their cut | Not stated | Not stated |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Video Hosting, Analytics, Media Storage & Review | Video Hosting, Analytics |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Our note
Only worth the per-seat price if somebody acts on the viewer data, because that reporting is the entire difference from a cheaper host. For publishing to an audience rather than to named people, look at the general video hosts on this site first.