Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
OpenShot and Shotcut are both free, open source video editors that run on Linux, macOS and Windows with no paid tier, no account and no watermark, funded entirely by donations. OpenShot aims for a simpler interface built around cutting a clip rather than learning a finishing suite, and its own listing states the actual trade-off plainly: pick it over Shotcut if the simpler interface matters more than format coverage. Shotcut reads a wider range of formats because FFmpeg does the work underneath, at the cost of an interface that takes a session to settle into. Neither has anything to upsell, since neither has anything to sell.
OpenShot | Shotcut | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Billing | Not stated | Not stated |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data export |
A simple open source video editor
OpenShot is an open source video editor released under the GPL, meant for somebody who wants to cut a clip without first learning a timeline suite. It runs on Linux, Mac and Windows, and the project is funded by donations rather than by a paid tier. It carries fewer features than the heavier free editors, which is the trade you are making.
Our note
Pick this over Shotcut if the simpler interface matters more than the format coverage, and pick neither if you already have DaVinci Resolve installed. The project has been going since 2008, which is worth something in free software.
A free desktop video editor, open source
Shotcut is a free desktop video editor that has been maintained for well over a decade and runs on Linux, macOS and Windows alike. It reads a wide range of formats because FFmpeg is doing the work underneath, and it asks for no account at any point. The interface takes a session to settle into. Nothing is upsold later.
Our note
This is the answer when the budget is nothing and the work is real, and the interface is the price you pay instead. DaVinci Resolve's free build is more capable if your machine can run it.
Pick OpenShot if you want the simpler of the two and are making occasional, straightforward cuts rather than heavy effects work. It has run on donations since 2008, which counts for something in free software, and by its own account it trades some feature depth for that simplicity.
Pick Shotcut if format coverage matters more, since FFmpeg underneath lets it open files other free editors refuse. The interface takes longer to settle into, and Linux users in particular have fewer alternatives than everyone else, part of why it is named as one of the better options there. Either way, DaVinci Resolve's free build is worth checking first if your machine can run it, since both of these trade some capability for a lighter footprint.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Their cut | None | None |
|---|
| Runs on | macOS, Windows, Linux | macOS, Windows, Linux |
|---|
| Covers | Video Editing | Video Editing |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.