Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Experiment funds science specifically, with every project reviewed before it goes public, funding all or nothing, and roughly 11 to 13 percent of a funded project going to the platform and payment processing combined. Kickstarter is open to any creative or product project with a real audience already browsing it, also all or nothing, taking roughly 8 to 10 percent once a project funds. Both charge nothing if a project misses its goal. The difference is the review, the audience, and what each will actually accept.
Crowdfunding for research projects
All or nothing funding with a real audience
Experiment | Kickstarter | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Billing | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data export |
Crowdfunding for research projects
Experiment funds science: a researcher posts a hypothesis, a budget and a method, and backers pay for the work rather than for a product. Every project is reviewed by a person before it goes public, and funding is all or nothing, so a project that misses its number charges nobody. What backers get back is the result, usually a paper or a data set. Anybody looking for a reward tier will find this a strange place.
Our note
Set the goal at what the work actually needs rather than at an ambitious number, because all-or-nothing turns an over-ambitious target into no money at all. The 8 percent is at the high end for crowdfunding, and what buys it is a reviewed, credible platform that scientific backers already trust.
All or nothing funding with a real audience
Kickstarter is still where a project with no list of its own has the best chance of finding backers, because people browse it the way they browse a shop. All or nothing is the rule: miss the goal and nobody is charged, which protects a creator from half-funding something they cannot deliver. Nothing about the platform helps after the campaign ends.
Pick Experiment if you have a hypothesis, a budget and a method, particularly for a small, awkward project a grant committee will not fund. The review is why scientific backers trust the page. It is the wrong platform for a product, a film or a business, and will fail the content review.
Pick Kickstarter for a first creative or product project with no mailing list, where the platform's own browsing traffic is the difference between funding and not. Anybody with an audience already may keep more money elsewhere. It has no review process built for earning a research pitch the trust of scientific backers.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Their cut (they differ) | 8% of what you earn | 5% of what you earn |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Crowdfunding | Crowdfunding, Monetization & Payments |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Only on this side