Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
EthicalAds shows one contextual ad per page with no tracking, and states its revenue share plainly: publishers keep 70 percent, though getting in needs an application and roughly 50,000 monthly pageviews from a developer audience. Infolinks sets no traffic minimum at all and will take a brand-new site, across six ad formats including in-text and interstitial units, but does not publish the share it pays before you apply. The trade is a known rate with a high bar to clear, against an open door with an unknown one.
Ads without tracking, for developer sites
Display ads with no traffic minimum to join
EthicalAds | Infolinks | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free | Free |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Billing | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Free trial | Not stated | Not stated |
| API | Not stated | Not stated |
| Data export |
Ads without tracking, for developer sites
EthicalAds targets on page content rather than on the reader, so a site running it needs no cookie banner and shows one ad instead of six. That is a smaller advertiser pool and a lower ceiling than a general network, and the trade is deliberate. Getting in is the hard part: the network is invite-only and aimed at sites a developer audience reads.
Our note
The published revenue share is the reason to read this one. Every other network in this category treats its split as confidential, so a stated 70 percent is a number you can hold them to.
Display ads with no traffic minimum to join
Infolinks places in-text, in-frame and interstitial ads on sites that the managed networks will not take, because it sets no pageview floor at all. That is its whole reason to exist and it is a real one for a site that is growing. The formats are more intrusive than a standard banner, and the rate it pays is not published anywhere before you apply.
Our note
Pick EthicalAds if your site is developer-facing, documentation or a technical newsletter already past roughly 50,000 monthly pageviews. One ad per page, no cookie banner, and a published 70 percent revenue share are the reasons to wait for the application.
Pick Infolinks if a site cannot yet clear anybody else's traffic floor, EthicalAds included, and revenue matters more than ad load right now. Six formats such as in-text and interstitial units are more intrusive than a standard banner, and the pay rate is not published anywhere before you apply, so weigh the revenue against what those formats cost in readers.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Not stated |
| Their cut | 30% of what you earn | Not stated |
|---|
| Runs on | Web | Web |
|---|
| Covers | Ad Networks, Monetization & Payments | Ad Networks, Monetization & Payments |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
The lack of a traffic floor is the reason to list it and the reason to be careful: intrusive formats on a small site can cost more in readers than they pay. Run it against AdSense for a month and compare both the revenue and the bounce rate before keeping either.