Making the work
Growing an audience
Running the business
Both cover website builders. Here is what separates them on price, billing, what you can take with you, and coverage.
Dorik | Duda | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price (they differ) | From $20.75 | From $19 |
| Pricing model | Free trial, then paid | Free trial, then paid |
| Free tier | No | No |
| Billing | Not stated | Not stated |
| Free trial (they differ) | 7 days | 14 days |
| API | Not stated | Yes |
| Data export | Not stated | Not stated |
| Their cut | None | None |
| Runs on |
Shaded rows are where the two answers disagree and both listings have answered. A row where one side has not stated a fact is left plain, because silence is not a difference.
Unlimited sites on one subscription
Dorik prices by subscription rather than per site, so an agency or a person with several projects pays once instead of once each, and that is the entire argument for it. Hosting is included. The editor is block-based and the CMS handles the ordinary cases without a plugin. The trade against the larger builders is a smaller template library and fewer integrations, which is felt most by anybody whose site needs to talk to something unusual.
Our note
The unlimited-sites framing is the reason to look, so compare it against the total of what you currently pay across every site rather than against one subscription. Note that the competitor totals printed on its pricing page are Wix, Webflow and Squarespace prices, not Dorik's.
A site builder aimed at people building for clients
Duda is built for somebody making sites for other people: client permissions, a white-label editor and a per-site price that scales with the number of projects rather than the size of one. Sites are fast and responsive without hand-tuning. The team and white-label tiers are where its actual audience sits, and the cheapest plan is a single site for somebody trying it. Anybody building one personal site will find the agency machinery irrelevant and the price higher than the consumer builders.
Ratings are the average of reviews readers left. The facts are stated by each tool’s own listing and are not verified by CloutStack. How we make money.
| Web |
| Web |
| Covers | Website Builders | Website Builders |
|---|
| Works with | Nothing in particular | Nothing in particular |
|---|
| Founded | Not listed | Not listed |
|---|
| Reader rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
|---|
| Live deals | None right now | None right now |
|---|
Our note
Count the sites you will publish, not the features you want, because the per-project charge is what actually sets your bill here. Against Webflow the split is that this is easier to hand to a non-technical client and harder to push into an unusual layout.